Instagram · May 29, 2026
Plant's Milk Possesses Anti-Fungal Properties, But Social Stigma Hinders Use
भाई कॉस्मेटिक कंपनियों को बंद करने की ताकत रखता है यह पौधा। इसे हमारे यहाँ पूर्वांचल में बोलते हैं मदार और बाहर भी बहुत जगह इसको मदार बोलते हैं और आक भी बोलते हैं। इसका जो दूध होता है ना वो एंटी फंगल प्रॉपर्टीज का होता है कि अगर आपकी स्किन पे रैशेज हो गए हैं, आपकी स्किन पे कोई फंगल इन्फेक्शन हो गया है तो वो उसको तुरंत ठीक करने की प्रॉपर्टी रखता है। लेकिन वही बात है कि भाई अगर आप यूज करोगे तो गँवार माने जाओगे। अगर वही कॉस्मेटिक कंपनियां बोलेंगी कि भाई ये वाला एसिड है, ये वाला चीज है तो आप इस्तेमाल कर लोगे। अगर आपने इसको कभी इस्तेमाल किया है तो आप कमेंट सेक्शन में लिखना ना भूलिएगा। इस वीडियो को ज्यादा से ज्यादा शेयर करिए और किसान भाइयों पेज को फॉलो करना ना भूलें। जय हिंद, जय किसान।
What's right
What's wrong
Breakdown
Anti-Fungal Properties and Treatment Claims The claim that the plant's milk has anti-fungal properties is supported by the what is said in the video [0]. Several references also mention plants with anti-fungal properties that are used for skin infections, such as tea tree oil, spilanthes, oregano oil, aloe vera, sweet flag, marigold, and sarsaparilla [1][2][3][4][6][8].
The what is said in the video states that the milk can treat skin rashes and fungal infections [0]. While some references indicate that certain plant-derived ingredients can help with fungal infections and skin conditions [1][2][3][4][6][8], none specify that the treatment is immediate, which is a part of the claim that is not substantiated by the provided context.
Social Stigma and Cosmetic Industry The what is said in the video mentions a social stigma, where using the plant leads to being considered 'gawar' (uncultured), and suggests that cosmetic companies market similar ingredients [0]. This aligns with the general trend of cosmetic companies utilizing plant-derived ingredients for their beneficial properties, including anti-fungal and antimicrobial effects [2][5][10][12].
However, the specific claim that this particular plant has the power to shut down cosmetic companies is an exaggeration and not supported by any evidence in the provided references. Overall Assessment The core of the claim—that a plant has anti-fungal properties beneficial for skin conditions and faces social stigma while its components are used in cosmetics—is partially supported.
The unsubstantiated elements are the immediacy of the treatment and the hyperbolic statement about shutting down cosmetic companies. [1][2][3]